Tuesday, February 12, 2008

[StemCells] UCLA successful in iPS creation

Scientists at UCLA reprogram human skin cells into embryonic stem
cells
By Kim Irwin| 2/11/2008 2:00:00 PM
UCLA stem cell scientists have reprogrammed human skin cells into
cells with the same unlimited properties as embryonic stem cells,
without using embryos or eggs.

Led by scientists Kathrin Plath and William Lowry, UCLA researchers
used genetic alteration to turn back the clock on human skin cells
and create cells that are nearly identical to human embryonic stem
cells, which have the ability to become every cell type found in the
human body. Four regulator genes were used to create the cells, which
are called induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells.

The UCLA study confirms the work of researchers Shinya Yamanaka at
Kyoto University and James Thomson at the University of Wisconsin,
first reported in late November 2007. The UCLA research appears today
in an early online edition of the journal Proceedings of the National
Academy of the Sciences.

The implications for disease treatment could be significant.
Reprogramming adult stem cells into embryonic stem cells could
generate a potentially limitless source of immune-compatible cells
for tissue engineering and transplantation medicine. A patient's skin
cells, for example, could be reprogrammed into embryonic stem cells,
and those stem cells could be prodded into becoming various cells
types — beta islet cells to treat diabetes, hematopoetic cells to
create a new blood supply for a leukemia patient or motor neuron
cells to treat Parkinson's disease.

"Our reprogrammed human skin cells were virtually indistinguishable
from human embryonic stem cells," said lead author Plath, an
assistant professor of biological chemistry and a researcher with
UCLA's Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem
Cell Research. "Our findings are an important step towards
manipulating differentiated human cells to generate an unlimited
supply of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells. We are very
excited about the potential implications."

The UCLA work was completed at about the same time the Yamanaka and
Thomson reports were published. Taken together, the studies
demonstrate that human iPS cells can be easily created by different
laboratories and are likely to mark a milestone in stem cell-based
regenerative medicine, Plath said.

These new techniques to develop stem cells could potentially replace
a controversial cell-reprogramming method known as somatic cell
nuclear transfer (SCNT), which is sometimes referred to as
therapeutic cloning. To date, therapeutic cloning has not been
successful in humans. However, top stem cell scientists worldwide
stress that further research comparing these reprogrammed iPS cells
with stem cells derived from embryos — considered the gold standard —
is necessary. Additionally, many technical problems, such as the use
of viruses to deliver the four genes for reprogramming, need to be
overcome to produce safe iPS cells that can be used in the clinic.

"Reprogramming normal human cells into cells with identical
properties to those in embryonic stem cells without SCNT may have
important therapeutic ramifications and provide us with another
valuable method to develop human stem cell lines," said first author
Lowry, an assistant professor of molecular, cell and developmental
biology and a Broad Stem Cell Center researcher. "It is important to
remember that our research does not eliminate the need for embryo-
based human embryonic stem cell research but rather provides another
avenue of worthwhile investigation."

The four genes used in combination to reprogram the skin cells
regulate expression of downstream genes and either activate or
silence their expression. The reprogrammed cells were not just
functionally identical to human embryonic stem cells — they also had
an identical biological structure, expressed the same genes and could
be coaxed into giving rise to the same types of cells.

The UCLA research team included four young scientists recruited to
UCLA's new stem cell center following the passage of California's
Proposition 71 in 2004, which created $3 billion in funding for
embryonic stem cell research. The scientists were drawn to UCLA in
part because of California's stem cell research-friendly atmosphere
and the funding opportunities created by the initiative. In addition
to Plath and Lowry, the team included Amander Clarke, assistant
professor of molecular, cell and developmental biology, and April
Pyle, assistant professor of microbiology, immunology and molecular
genetics.

The creation of the human iPS cells is an extension of Plath's work
on mouse stem cell reprogramming. Plath headed one of three research
teams that were able to successfully reprogram mouse skin cells into
mouse embryonic stem cells. That work appeared in the inaugural June
2007 issue of the journal Cell Stem Cell.

UCLA's stem cell center was launched in 2005 with a UCLA commitment
of $20 million over five years. A $20 million gift from the Eli and
Edythe Broad Foundation in 2007 resulted in the renaming of the
center.

The Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem
Cell Research at UCLA, with more than 150 members, is committed to a
multidisciplinary, integrated collaboration of scientific, academic
and medical disciplines for the purpose of understanding adult and
human embryonic stem cells. The institute supports innovation,
excellence and the highest ethical standards focused on stem cell
research with the intent of facilitating basic scientific inquiry
directed towards future clinical applications to treat disease. The
center is a collaboration of the David Geffen School of Medicine at
UCLA, UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, the UCLA Henry
Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, and the UCLA
College of Letters and Science. To learn more about the center, visit
www.stemcell.ucla.edu.

http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/scientists-reprogram-human-
skin-44173.aspx

__._,_.___
____________________________________________
«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
StemCells subscribers may also be interested in these sites:

Children's Neurobiological Solutions
http://www.CNSfoundation.org/

Cord Blood Registry
http://www.CordBlood.com/at.cgi?a=150123

The CNS Healing Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CNS_Healing
____________________________________________
«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Get it all here

Breaking news to

entertainment news

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Dog Groups

on Yahoo! Groups

Share pictures &

stories about dogs.

.

__,_._,___

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, 3th Edition is a good textbook. I got the book from online bookstore Cocomartini.com
http://www.cocomartini.com
The textbook is brand new textbooks and half price discount textbooks and cheap textbooks.

Good luck and wish some help.

hehe ^_^



about stem cell research
adult stem cell
adult stem cell research
adult stem cells
against stem cell
against stem cell research
anti stem cell
anti stem cell research
autologous stem cell
autologous stem cell transplant
benefits of stem cell research
blood stem cells
bone marrow stem cells
bush stem cell
california stem cell
cancer stem cell
cancer stem cells
cell stem cell
cons of stem cell research
cord blood stem cell
cord blood stem cells
cord stem cells
diabetes stem cell
embryonic stem cell
embryonic stem cell research
embryonic stem cells
for stem cell research
funding for stem cell research
harvard stem cell
harvard stem cell institute
hematopoietic stem cell
hematopoietic stem cells
history of stem cell research
human embryonic stem cell
human embryonic stem cell research
human embryonic stem cells
international stem cell
mesenchymal stem cell
mesenchymal stem cells
neural stem cell
neural stem cells
nih stem cell
pluripotent stem cells
pro stem cell
pro stem cell research
pros and cons of stem cell
pros and cons of stem cell research
stem cell
stem cell bank
stem cell bill
stem cell biology
stem cell companies
stem cell conference
stem cell controversy
stem cell cures
stem cell debate
stem cell differentiation
stem cell ethics
stem cell funding
stem cell heart
stem cell information
stem cell institute
stem cell line
stem cell lines
stem cell news
stem cell policy
stem cell reasearch
stem cell reaserch
stem cell reseach
stem cell research
stem cell research articles
stem cell research bill
stem cell research controversy
stem cell research debate
stem cell research enhancement act
stem cell research ethics
stem cell research facts
stem cell research funding
stem cell research pros
stem cell research pros and cons
stem cell reserach
stem cell reserch
stem cell technologies
stem cell technology
stem cell therapy
stem cell transplant
stem cell transplantation
stem cell transplants
stem cell treatment
stem cell treatments
stem cell veto
stem cells
stem cells research
support stem cell research
types of stem cells
umbilical cord stem cells
what are stem cells
what is a stem cell
what is stem cell
what is stem cell research